Of course even exceptional horses are not perfect, and the possibility exists (however remote it might be) of producing a foal with all of the faults but none of the strengths of its illustrious forebears. When inbreeding or linebreeding great care must be taken in the selection of breeding stock and it is not something that should be undertaken lightly. However with skill, a sound understanding of the bloodlines one is breeding gleaned from painstaking research and a good eye for a horse the benefits can be considerable!

It is essential if one is to use this breeding tool that the "normal" rules of good breeding practice are strictly adhered to. Since the idea is to produce an individual that is both prepotent and superior to its parents not one that is guaranteed to have and pass on their faults. Linebreeding is a powerful tool and needs careful use and consideration as well as honestly appraising the results of each mating. Those that are and have been very successful with line breeding such as Ansata, Om El Arab, Dr Nagel, Peter Gross and the Filsingers don't just concentrate on one particular line but on a handful, blending one or two sirelines in with two or three damlines to get the results they want. It is of course possible to linebreed to just a sire for a generation or two and get good (or even exceptional ) results, this isn't the way that the real "artists" of the breed do things. In fact even if you are thinking of linebreeding to an exceptional stallion, you are not only hopefully increasing the influence of  this sire but also that of his dam, therefore it makes sense to try to take into account the influence that at least this damline is going to have on your breeding programme in addition to that of your chosen stallion.

So what does the pedigree of a linebred horse look like? What effect does a significant amount of line breeding have on how inbred a horse actually is? Lets look at an example and find out.

Exceptional was thus linebred to Rasim and to Rasim’s granddam Ridaa. His coefficient of inbreeding (over 8 generations) is 0.2321, which is substantially higher than the figure for a horse with an open pedigree. The actual number of crosses to his most significant ancestors is shown below.

From this column we can deduce that Exceptional had (statistically speaking) essentially the same genes as his sire The Chief and grandsire Oran both being by Riffal out of Astrella. He was also effectively (in terms of the percentage of shared genes) a grandson of Rasim, Risala, Mesaoud, Astraled, and Narghileh having at least 25% of his genes in common with these horses.

Exceptional was therefore a horse rich in the blood of these early Crabbet horses. This is effectively what line breeding does, it maintains the influence of  significant ancestors at a level somewhere between that of a parent and a grandparent over however many generations it is practised.

However, one of the effects of linebreeding, is that over a period of time and a number of generations the genetic base of ones breeding stock becomes significantly reduced. This is particularly true if one started out with foundation stock that that were already related to one another, even if those initial horses were only fairly distantly related. This is especially true if one is breeding within a closed group of predefined horses such as the Straight Egyptians where the number of  “usable” bloodlines is artificially constrained by the definition of the group, even before the breeder chooses to restrict themselves only to certain bloodlines. The long-term viability of such groupings is a cause for concern in itself  but one that falls outside of the scope of this article. Linebreeding is a tool which can be very effective if used correctly and in moderation, it can be thought of as an “effort multiplier” rather like the power steering in a car that makes life so much easier when you want to park! Since it is purely a tool it doesn’t make judgements it just does its job. Either for good or bad depending on the soundness of the breeding decisions of the person using it. Whilst the tool can make the good choices better it will also make bad choices much worse with equal ease and efficiency, something that should always be at the forefront of the breeders mind should he or she decide to use it. Like DIY power tools which can make tasks easier when used correctly but can equally (and rapidly) create a real disaster in the hands of an unskilled novice, linebreeding should not be used or undertaken lightly nor of course are horses pieces of wood which can easily be discarded should one happen to cut a bit too much off by mistake.  To continue the analogy for just a moment longer carpenters do not try to do their job with just the one screwdriver nor should linebreeding be the only tool in the breeders “toolkit”.

I believe that the benefits of linebreeding are most significant in the first generation or two thereafter the possible gains diminish rapidly away to nothing whilst the risks of  “getting it wrong” remain at best constant.

It is also essential I believe that if one is linebreeding to a particular horse in order to “fix” his or her look, then this horse is the only one that should be doubled up in the first generation of linebreeding, thereafter other lines can be re-introduced as the breeder sees fit. Studying the pedigree’s of horses bred by those who have practised the art of linebreeding for many years, shows that the “recognisable look” which has resulted is almost invariably the product of a generation or two of linebreeding followed by an outcross followed by another generation or two of what I shall call “adjusted” linebreeding.

I use the term “adjusted” because the breeder needs to allow for the new blood that has been added and also for the changes in the breeding stock that will have occurred over the previous generations. This post outcross linebreeding will probably not be to exactly the same horse(s) as before the outcross and the characteristics that the breeder is now trying to “fix” will also have changed, even if only slightly from before.  A breeding programme evolves over time, as the horses used within that programme change with each generation, therefore the breeding decisions made must also change subtly to reflect and take account of what has gone on before. In most cases the “outcrosses” used in such breeding programmes are far from being totally unrelated to the breeders own stock and the “new” bloodlines are few in number but perhaps sufficient to reinvigorate the breeding programme and to take it in a new and slightly different direction. One further point to make is that whilst the science of genetics hasn’t so far established quite how certain physical characteristics are linked to a horses colour, there is strong anecdotal evidence to suggest that such links do exist. I would strongly recommend therefore that when linebreeding to a particular horse, the sires used to achieve this, should wherever possible be the same colour as the horse that one is linebreeding to.

The most important tool in any breeders “toolkit” is a good eye for a horse, in fact I believe that without that eye, one probably shouldn’t be breeding horses at all! Secondly comes a clear vision of what it is you are trying to achieve, this needs to be something rather more concrete than “a very good horse”. The breeder needs to have a clear mental picture of  exactly what the horse that they are trying to produce looks like. The next most important tool is a good working knowledge of pedigree’s and the horses therein.

Knowledge is Power! As I hope to be able to show later. After these three come linebreeding and out crossing which I believe should be given equal importance along with the knowledge of when to stop practicing them. Just because a degree of linebreeding or out crossing may prove to be a good thing , it most definitely does not follow that more of the same will be even better.

Equally one should not be breeding just to perpetuate or add names in a pedigree, ultimately what counts is the quality of the horses bred and this is rather more important than the methods which were used to achieve the end result.

However it is not necessary to breed together close relatives in order to gain some benefit from careful line breeding as I hope to show in the following examples from my own very modest efforts in breeding. Below is the pedigree of the mare W Princess Bahiya, a daughter of the well-known Morafic son The Egyptian Prince. Her pedigree is perhaps typical of the straight Egyptian breeding programmes of twenty years or so ago. She is the result of two generations of linebreeding to Morafic which followed a single generation of linebreeding to Morafic’s sire Nazeer and to the mare Malaka who was the dam of Salomy as well as of  Samia whose name appears in the bottom right hand corner of the pedigree. In the second generation of US breeding the Nazeer grandson Samim was bred to the Nazeer granddaughter Il Durra to produce the mare Yasamin. Thus “doubling up” on the Nazeer blood,  both horses also traced in tail female line to Malaka, with Samim being a grandson and Il Durra being a great granddaughter of the same mare. This female line was thus also “doubled up”. Yasamin was then bred to the Morafic grandson Sar Ibn Moniet to produce the mare Hi-Fashion Bahiya.  This mating changed the emphasis of the linebreeding since the Morafic blood had now been doubled up as well and additional lines to Nazeer were also added since Sar Ibn Moniet’s dam Sirella was linebred to another Nazeer son namely Rashad Ibn Nazeer.

Hi-Fashion Bahiya was also linebred to Moniet El Nefous since she was the dam of Ibn Moniet El Nefous, Bint Moniet El Nefous as well as Mabrouka who was the dam of Morafic. The final breeding of Hi-Fashion Bahiya to TheEgyptianPrince effectively maintained the status quo as this was a mating to a Morafic son whose dam Bint Mona was by Nazeer out of Mouna who was a full sister of Mabrouka who was in turn (as previously mentioned ) the dam of Morafic.

Firstly as one might expect she is an extremely pretty mare with huge eyes and very expressive nostrils capable of  considerable expansion. As one might expect given her breeding, she isn’t a big mare either (standing at around 14 hands 2 inches) though lack of size is hardly a fault!

Obviously as a breeder one wishes to maintain the strengths, whilst improving on the weaknesses. Breeding her to a horse with good hind legs and movement should help in these areas, as I also wished to increase the mares height it is worth looking at her pedigree a little more closely for clues which might help. Rashad Ibn Nazeer and Sid Abouhom were both tall “leggy” horses, and in addition Sid Abouhom was sickle hocked (that is he had over angulated hind legs) the exact opposite fault of the mare. Increasing his influence in conjunction with using a sire with good hind legs could well help in correcting this particular fault. Also Moniet El Nefous was a small very refined mare so further linebreeding to her would be unlikely to help increase the height of the foal. It is worth noting that the mare is Koheilan Rodan in strain tracing to the Blunt foundation mare Rodania through the mare Ridaa and that Ridaa was also the dam of Rissla (1917) who was particularly famous for her movement. Reinforcing the strain and tail female line might well help considerably in improving the mare’s movement.  Finally as W Princess Bahiya is the result of two generations of linebreeding to Morafic, this is probably the point where some fresh blood and a change of emphasis would be most beneficial.